In this episode of Marketing Obsessions with Kevin Lee, Jeff Hayzlett, CMO of Kodak, talks about common CMO mistakes that can lead to a branding downfall.
Discovery is the only way to keep living. Join me as I explore what's new, both online and offline. I observe. I post. I think. I share. And I welcome you to do the same.
Saturday, February 13, 2010
From iMedia: 3 CMO mistakes that will ruin your brand (VIDEO)
In this episode of Marketing Obsessions with Kevin Lee, Jeff Hayzlett, CMO of Kodak, talks about common CMO mistakes that can lead to a branding downfall.
Monday, April 13, 2009
From AdAge Digital: Twitter as a Marketing Tool -- Avertisers take heed
Top 10 Reasons Your Company Probably Shouldn't Tweet
Everyone's Talking About It, but Should You Be Doing It?
Posted by B.L. Ochman on 04.07.09 @ 09:16 AM

Mainstream media has gone ga ga about Twitter, which grew more than 1,200% in the past year, doubled its members in the past few months and attained 14 million members in March, according to Compete.
Everyone and his dog seems to be tweeting, from CEOs to celebrities to not-for-profits, venture capitalists, banks, business services, government and, well, dogs (and cats, and the random parakeet, too). Should your business be tweeting? Twitter is not for everyone. Here are the Top 10 Reasons Not to Tweet.
- You think using Twitter is a social-media strategy. It's a tactic, a tool, not a strategy. It works if you already have an online following who'll view your Tweets as a way to interact with your company on a human level.
- Every tweet has to be approved by legal. Twitter is a social network where conversation is fast and interconnected. If you have to wait a day, or even a few hours for your 140 character Tweet to gain legal approval, Twitter will be the wrong platform for you.
- You plan to use Twitter for nothing but broadcasting headlines or deals. People follow people they find interesting. Followers are earned on Twitter. Be interesting, make only every 10th tweet about you, and you'll gain and keep a following. If all your tweets are a one-way street: Block!
- You think a ghost tweeter for the president of your company is OK. Authentic and transparent are the keys. It's fine if someone besides the CEO tweets for your company, as long as they say that's what they're doing.
- You are not going to respond when people direct tweets at you. Twitter is like the new water cooler. If you walked out to the water fountain and talked nonstop to people gathered there, they'd certainly be happy when you left. Ditto for Twitter.
- You think Tweeting as XYZ Corp., using the company logo as your avatar, might be a good idea. Identify the person or people tweeting for your company or don't tweet. The days of hiding behind the faceless corporation are over.
- You think all that matters on Twitter is getting a lot of people to follow you. Quality trumps quantity.
- You want to protect your updates. If people have to ask permission to see what you're posting on Twitter, you're defeating the purpose, which is conversation.
- You plan to track Twitter with Google Analytics. Google Analytics won't give you true tracking. You can track the URLs you post with a service like BudURL or bit.ly, but you'll need to use one or more social-media tracking tools to monitor your corporate reputation and influence on Twitter.
- You think you can just jump in and start tweeting. Listen first. Monitor what's being said about your brand, your industry, your products. Then join the conversation and become part of the community. Then your occasional marketing messages will be accepted, or at least tolerated because you also add value to the community.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
from Looking Up: A Break in the Clouds
- Keep your brands consistent with the new sense of risk that consumers are bringing to the marketplace. Broadly speaking, there have been three eras of risk perception since the Great Depression. The first was an era of planning in which risk was viewed as real and plans were made to deal with it. This ended with the economic revival of the mid-1980s that corresponded to the start of the last great bull-market run and the so-called “great moderation” in which the economy was relatively stable and growing. This period was an era of indulgence in which risk was thought to be a thing of the past and thus could be ignored (or managed by “laying it off”). The recent downturn, in both its speed and severity, has brought risk back to the forefront. What’s ahead is an era of consequences in whichconsumers will take more explicit account of the consequences of their decisions as they make choices in the marketplace. Thus, responsibility and accountability will be more important elements of the consumer decision calculus. Building these factors into brand propositions will give consumers confidence that your brands matter in this new era and are the kinds of relationships that they want to have as they reengage with the marketplace.
- Focus on innovations that will excite consumer passions despite any residual caution and reserve. The old reasons to buy have been discredited by the downturn. The ambition of “trading up”—the central dynamic of the past decade-plus—no long seems compelling. It was largely fueled by debt and expectations of constantly rising wealth, both of which are now seen to be wrong. And it does not fit a responsible way of consuming to have over-reaching material ambitions. So the old reasons no longer work. New reasons will have to be provided, and these will be part and parcel of a more strongly innovative presence in the marketplace. Key platforms for innovation include sustainability, community and civic renewal, health and well-being, and new kinds of service, all of which have been discussed in previous issues of Looking Up. The time has come for putting more effort behind these kinds of innovations.
- Practice optimism. At the moment that things are showing signs of life, it is unwise to have a downbeat presence in the marketplace or to disappear from the marketplace entirely. Consumers want to interact with brands that mirror these hopeful signs. They want an ally to show them a way forward. They want brands that will inspire them and energize them. People want to believe again, even if they don’t want to go back to the way things were. This kind of optimistic approach is what will make your brands speak to consumers in ways that resonate and motivate.
How Very Familiar...
CMO: We want you to get bloggers to write about our site and generate 250K monthly visits through their posts.
Agency: What is your demographic? What is your goal for that traffic?
CMO: We want them to spend money on the site, and we want to see how much traffic social media can generate.
Agency: What support will you give to your "experiment"? Does your budget include search engine optimization? PR? Google advertising? Company blog? Advertising on targeted blogs? A forum? An interactive website? Content sponsorship? Sponsored blog posts? Videos? Print advertising? Email campaign?
CMO: Those cost money. We don't have budget available for any of those.
Agency: Who on your staff has this campaign as his/her full-time responsibility?
CMO: Nobody.
Agency: What other marketing tools can we employ? Can we create a blog? Facebook page? Flickr group? YouTube videos? Twitter? Can we participate in social networks including Friend Feed and other online communities?
CMO: Our legal department says we cannot allow people to write on the wall on our Facebook pages. We can't participate in Twitter because everything we say has to pass through legal first and approval can take several days. So any site where we are expected to engage in public conversation would be out.