Showing posts with label Mashable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mashable. Show all posts

Thursday, January 27, 2011

From Mashable: Faebook Stories -- A New Social Ad Format Uses User-Generated Content


As a digital marketer, I've seen how user-generated content has become a more compelling way to tell a brand story, vis-a-vis just the plain old marketing message from advertising. This new ad format created from Facebook could very well be able to operationalize that to an advertiser's advantage.

I do think there will be an initial backlash to this due to privacy issues, but I really think Facebook's principles with the Open Graph has revolutionizes social computing and privacy options will more and more be the responsibility of the user rather than the platform. Agree that Facebook needs to inform its users of the privacy issues and that it should give easy options for users to keep their information private. But the openness of the Facebook architecture has driven this social change that has created the socially-enabled experience of the Web that we see today.

Here's Ben Parr's story on Mashable on Facebook Stories

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facebook Turns Friend Activity Into New Ad Format


Facebook is rolling out Sponsored Stories, a new ad format that turns your friends’ actions into promoted content.

Sponsored Stories is “a way for marketers to sponsor activities that happen throughout the News Feed,” Facebook Product Marketing Lead Jim Squires told Mashable. Companies can choose to take certain user actions — such as checkins or actions within Facebook apps — and feature them in the column on the right side of the News Feed.

For example, if you’re Whole Foods and you’re looking to increase your exposure on Facebook, you can pay to have a percentage of all checkins to Whole Foods featured in a Sponsored Stories slot in the right-side column. Your content wouldn’t be shown directly, but the actions of a user’s friends would appear. Users seeing their friends “liking” or checking in to Whole Foods will drive increased trust and increased traffic.

“The advertiser is not controlling the message; it’s about actions,” Squires said.

Here’s an example of an action that could potentially be sponsored:

And here’s what it might look like as a Sponsored Story:

Starting today, four specific types of user actions can be turned into featured stories: likes, checkins, actions within custom applications and Page posts. If a company has a custom app (e.g. Starbucks Card or evenFarmVille), it can promote the actions users take within them. The same is true of users posting on the walls of their favorite brands.

Facebook’s roster of launch partners includes Coke, Levi’s, Anheuser Busch and Playfish. Also, the social network is partnering with a slew of nonprofits for Sponsored Stories, including Donors Choose, Girl Up!, Malaria No More, Amnesty International, Women for Women, Autism Speaks, (RED), Alzheimer’s Association and UNICEF. However, anybody will be able to bid on Sponsored Story slots (by a per-impression and/or a per-click basis) starting January 25.

We haven’t seen Facebook play with new ad formats for a while — most of its revenue comes from the targeted advertising that appears on most Facebook pages. It has been timid about new ad formats after the spectacular failure of Beacon. Sponsored Stories seems like a simple and logical way to introduce new forms of advertising into Facebook’s system, though.

Sponsored Stories has a lot of similarities to Twitter Promoted Tweets. Both are trying to use content from within their networks and turn them into advertising dollars. There is one key difference between Sponsored Stories and Promoted Tweets, though: The user defines the advertised content in Facebook’s format, not the advertiser.

It’s that one little difference Facebook hopes will turn into big bucks.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

From Mashable: The Semantic Web The Semantic Web -- What It Is and Why It Matters [VIDEO]



Web 3.0 from Kate Ray on Vimeo.

If you’ve ever struggled to make sense of terms like “semantic web,” we’ve got a fascinating, entertaining and informative video for you.

The Internet currently holds about as much information as 1,700 Libraries of Congress. Some of the leading minds on the web are exploring new ways to sort this data and how to understand not just what data is about, but also how data is linked.

For example, a picture on Flickr is more than just a number of pixels and a file size. It was uploaded by a person and might contain images of other people. It might have been taken in a specific place or be about a specific moment in time. Those bits of information link that photograph to other entities: people, places, things and events. When we know how data is linked and we use that information to determine relevancy across media and sources, we’re using the semantic web.

Simply put, the semantic web gives us more than just raw data; it shows us the context and relationships behind and between those data.

Student Kate Ray interviewed a flock of researchers, entrepreneurs and other innovators for her 14-minute documentary, Web 3.0. Ray is a journalism/psych major at NYU who has done extensive research on the semantic web. Her subjects include World Wide Web creator Tim Berners-Lee, Hunch.com CEO and inventor Chris Dixon, and a host of other semantic web experts.

Ray’s film is a brief but high-level discussion of semantic technologies, the tech that’s going to affect how we use the Internet and all its information for years to come. If you’ve ever wanted to know more about the semantic web, what it is and why it matters to all kinds of Internet users, we highly recommend checking out this documentary above.




Monday, March 8, 2010

From Mashable: WordPress Goes Real-Time With PubSubHubbub


by Barb Dybwad | originally from Mashable

WordPress.com‘ 10.5 million blogs are about to get a whole lot more real-time, thanks to a new behind-the-scenes development.

The WordPress team has announced in a blog post that the company has turned on support for PubSubHubbub (try saying that fast five times), a move that will get blog content to RSS services (such as Google Reader and Bloglines) much more quickly.

Essentially it’s a way for hosted WordPress blogs to “push” content out as it’s published to the services, rather than waiting for the services to check in for new posts. It’s live now for WordPress.com blogs, while self-hosted blogs can go real-time with this plugin.

PubHubSubbub, or PuSH, is demoed nicely in the “cheesy” video (that’s WordPress’ choice of word, not ours) below. However those of you who want to find out more about the new protocol can do so over at the PuSH project site.






Monday, March 1, 2010

From Mashable: Has Digg Found the Winning Formula for Ads?




Digg took a big risk when they added in-line advertisements that users could digg or bury. Four months later, however, early signs indicate that DiggAds are a win for all parties involved: users, advertisers, and especially Digg.

This latest bit of information was shared in a blog post earlier today that details how the DiggAds system actually works and the results thus far.

Here are the key details from Digg’s comments:

- DiggAds is powered by a complex auction-based system that attempts to serve users with the highest quality ads — Digg assigns their own quality score to ads — while factoring in the advertiser’s bidding price. It’s like Google Adsense but with quality scoring. The idea is to reward high quality ads with lower CPCs; the more diggs an ad gets the less the advertiser pays.

- Feedback from users is mostly positive, but one of the biggest user requests is to be able to comment on ads. Users are also confused by buried ads that reappear, but Digg suggests that in this case it’s just advertisers experimenting with ad format and resubmitting.

- DiggAds will evolve to include comments and address the “long-live” ad issue where ads get misleadingly high digg counts.

- The system is working with Digg saying that, “From a revenue perspective, things have been great”.

What’s especially interesting is that DiggAds displays advertisements to site users in the same format as other Digg content — so ads are a part of the Digg stream like other stories — but for the most part users appear to be embracing the model instead of rejecting it (and Digg’s community has historically not been shy over voicing displeasure with things they don’t like).

As Twitter prepares to unveil its own alternative ad platform, we have to wonder if they’ll emulate some of Digg’s tactics and whether or not Twitter’s very vocal user base will be as accepting as Digg’s has been.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Mashable's Face-off Series


Mashable has been running polls for a couple of months now, pitting two (or three) apps/companies/technologies against each other and getting their readers to vote.

Here are some of the past weeks' results:

Week 1:
-
Mozilla Firefox vs. Google Chrome
-
WINNER: Firefox, 4600 votes (Chrome: 3310 votes, Tie: 911 votes)

Week 2:
-
Tumblr vs. Posterous
-
WINNER: TumblrTumblr, 1809 votes (PosterousPosterous: 1496 votes, Tie: 256 votes)

Week 3:
-
Pandora vs. Last.fm
-
WINNER: Last.fm, 1187 votes (PandoraPandora: 1156 votes, Tie: 122 votes)

Week 4:
-
Twitter vs. Facebook
-
WINNER: FacebookFacebook, 2484 votes (TwitterTwitter: 2061 votes, Tie: 588 votes)

Week 5:
-
WordPress vs. Typepad
-
WINNER: WordPressWordPress, 2714 votes (TypepadTypePad: 267 votes, Tie: 357 votes)

Week 6:
-
Windows 7 vs. Snow Leopard
-
WINNER: WindowsWindows 7, 3632 votes (Snow Leopard: 3278 votes, Tie: 121 votes)

Week 7:
-
TweetDeck vs. Seesmic Desktop
-
WINNER: TweetDeckTweetDeck, 3294 votes (Seesmic DesktopSeesmic Desktop: 1055 votes, Tie: 260 votes)

Week 8:
-
Microsoft Office vs. Google Docs
-
WINNER: Microsoft Office, 1365 votes (Google DocsGoogle Docs: 994 votes, Tie: 315 votes)

Week 9:
-
Apple iPhone vs. Google Android
-
WINNER: Google Android, 3323 votes (Apple iPhone: 1494 votes, Tie: 228 votes)

Week 10:
-
AT&T vs. Verizon
-
WINNER: Verizon, 1161 votes (AT&T: 538 votes, Tie: 118 votes)

Week 11:
-
Google vs. Bing
-
WINNER: GoogleGoogle, 2180 votes (BingBing: 519 votes, Tie: 97 votes)

Week 12:
-
iPod Touch/iPhone vs. Nintendo DS vs. Sony PSP
-
WINNER: iPod Touch/iPhone, 704 votes (Sony PSP: 639 votes, Nintendo DS: 482 votes, Tie: 108 votes)

Week 13:
-
Digg vs. Reddit vs. StumbleUpon
-
WINNER: Digg, 14,762 votes (Reddit: 11,466 votes, StumbleUpon: 2507 votes, Tie: 1032 votes)

Week 14:
-
Old versus new Twitter retweets
-
WINNER: Old style retweets, 1625 votes (New style retweets: 699 votes, Tie: 227 votes)

Week 15:
-
Gmail vs. Outlook
-
WINNER: Gmail, 3684 votes (Outlook: 980 votes, Tie: 590 votes)

Week 16:
-
Boxee vs. Hulu
-
WINNER: Hulu, 626 votes (Boxee: 591 votes, Tie: 106 votes)

Week 17:
-
Nexus One vs. iPhone 3GS
-
WINNER: Nexus One, 6743 votes (iPhone 3GS: 2818 votes, Tie: 592 votes)

Week 18:
-
Foursquare vs. Yelp vs. Gowalla
-
WINNER: Foursquare, 1182 votes, (Yelp: 661 votes, Gowalla: 509 votes, Tie: 143 votes)

Week 19:
-
AIM vs. GTalk vs. FbChat
-
WINNER: GTalk, 2189 votes, (AIM: 1257 votes, FbChat: 511 votes, Tie: 203 votes)

Week 20:
-
Music Ownership vs. Music Subscription
-
WINNER: Ownership, 533 votes (Subscription: 299 votes, Tie: 237)

Week 21:
-
Match.com vs. PlentyofFish
-
WINNER: Plenty of Fish, 430 votes (Match.com: 334 votes, Tie: 187 votes)

Week 21:
-
Google Buzz vs. Facebook Vs. Twitter

- WINNER: Facebook, 3353 votes (Twitter: 1828 votes, Google Buzz: 1298 votes, Tie: 651 votes)

This week's poll: Adobe Flash vs. HTML 5

Which will you vote for?

NuffNang Breaks

Spread the word!