Friday, February 25, 2011

What Can Make You Happy? Click to Find Out.

Watch this video clip recently posted on YouTube: 





In a local adaptation of Coca-Cola's global Happiness campaign, the Coca-Cola Happiness Truck has struck in the Philippines. 


Coke writes in their YouTube post:
A Coca-Cola delivery truck is converted into a happiness machine on wheels delivering "doses" of happiness in the streets of Marikina, Philippines. Where will happiness strike next?
It's great to see simple joys being celebrated, and it's apt for Filipinos like how it was apt for a bunch of campus students in the US version. I like the localization to a roving truck bringing happiness to far-reaching corners of the country.


Where will the Coca-Cola Happiness Truck strike next? Only Coke knows. Will this go viral as hoped? Only if you pass it on. ;)

Thursday, February 10, 2011

From BitRebels: Battle of the Tablets

I've been waiting for the tablet market to mature a bit before I decide to get one for myself. More specifically, I'm one of those peeps who are looking for the "iPad killer." The infographic below I found from BitRebels give a great side-by-side comparison of what's currently available.


I'm really hoping that the Motorola Xoom lives up to its promise because that's what I currently have set my eyes on. I got the first-gen Nexus (Nexus One) and I'm looking forward to the first device to carry Honeycomb (Android 3.0) which was developed specifically for tablets.




---------------------------------------------------

Tablet Wars: A Complete Brand Comparison [Infographic]




Wednesday, February 9, 2011

When Business Objectives Collide with User Experience (and Client Timelines) (inspired by Smashing Magazine)

Yesterday, I had a sort of heated email thread with a client and an accounts person about a campaign that was being rushed but needed a registration page and a database to be built. The database structure had not yet been defined well, and one was arguing for user experience, the other was arguing for more profiling data, and I was arguing for the segmentation strategy.


In eCRM, especially during data gathering, you'd want to strike a good balance between ease of the user and the quality of data you're gathering. And an initial registration page is not the best place to start gathering research data. For me, the main goal is to get just enough information as possible to (1) re-contact the prospect, and (2)be able to segment your database. Profiling questions need to be actionable. If there's no contact strategy behind asking a question, then it's secondary to the user experience.
Add to that the considerations of development time needed vs. the desired user experience, and you know what mess you could be in.


Thanks, G.A. for sharing this article from Smashing Magazine, which talks to web designers about the balance between user experience and business objectives. Realistically, I think there's still a lot of discussion needed between design aesthetic vs. user experience in this part of the world, but this article grounds the discussion from the other extreme -- when user experience is all that seems to matter. Read on.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Smashing Magazine

Business Objectives vs. User Experience

Advertisement

Here’s a question for you: would you agree that creating a great user experience should be the primary aim of any Web designer? I know what your answer is… and youʼre wrong!
Okay, I admit that not all of you would have answered yes, but most probably did. Somehow, the majority of Web designers have come to believe that creating a great user experience is an end in itself. I think we are deceiving ourselves and doing a disservice to our clients at the same time.
The truth is that business objectives should trump users’ needs every time. Generating a return on investment is more important for a website than keeping users happy. Sounds horrendous, doesn’t it? Before you flame me in the comments, hear me out.

The Harsh Reality

Letʼs begin with the harsh truth. If an organization does not believe that it will generate some form of a return on an investment (financial or otherwise), then it should not have a website. In other words, if the website doesn’t pay its way, then we have not done our jobs properly.
Despite what we might think, our primary aim is to fulfill the business objectives set out by our clients. Remember that creating a great user experience is a means to this end. We do not create great user experiences just to make users happy. We do so because we want them to look favorably on the website and take certain actions that will generate the returns that our clients want.
Business-vs -User-experience in Business Objectives vs. User Experience
Is the business world at odds with creativity? Image by opensourceway

User Experience Is Important

Let me be clear. Iʼm not suggesting that user experience is unimportant. In fact, I believe that creating an amazing experience is the primary means of helping a website fulfill its business objectives. A well-designed website makes it easy for users to complete the calls to action we have created.
Happy users also provide many other benefits. They can become advocates for your website. A happy user is considerably more likely to recommend your services and is more patient when things occasionally go wrong. Enthusiastic users can also become valuable volunteers; they have innumerable ideas about how your website and products can be improved. They are far more valuable than any focus group!
The point, though, is that happy users generate a return on investment, so spending the time and effort to give them a great experience is worth it.

When Business Objectives and User Experience Clash

You may argue that this is all semantics and that business objectives and user experience actually go hand in hand. Generally, I agree, but there are occasions when the two clash, and at these times we need to be clear that generating a return on investment should trump user experience.
Let me give you an example. We Web designers often complain when clients ask us to add fields to their online forms because they want to collect certain demographic information about their users. We argue, rightly, that this annoys users and damages the user experience. But we need to ask ourselves whether those additional fields would make users not complete the forms at all—as we fear—or would just slightly irritate them. If users ultimately complete the form and the company is able to gather valuable demographic information, then the slight irritation may be worthwhile.

Do You Have The Right Balance?

Iʼm a little nervous about this post because I realize that many people could misinterpret what Iʼm saying. But I passionately believe that the Web design community is in danger of becoming blind to all else but user experience. Iʼm convinced we need to spend as much time and effort on understanding and achieving business objectives as we do on creating a great experience.
I’ll end with this: during your last project, how much time did you spend creating personas, testing usability and generally improving the user experience? How does that compare with the amount of time you spent learning about the client’s business objectives and creating great calls to action?
Ask yourself whether you got the balance right.

Monday, February 7, 2011

It's Coming! The Motorola Zoom [VIDEO]

Something I've been waiting for and I predict will be a game changer for the tablet market: Motorola Zoom.

Watch the video they launched at the Super Bowl:

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

From Google Blog: Bing is copying Google Search results


In doing basic search optimization, I've always focused on Google results, yet mindful of the fact that Yahoo uses Bing to power their search results, and Yahoo still being a major part of search in the Philippines.

It's difficult enough to figure out the intricacies of the Google Search algorithm, but reading that Bing copies Google's search engine results just validates what I thought was the right thing to do. You optimize for Google, more or less you're optimized for Yahoo & Bing. It's not best practice, but it's what you resort to with clients who are not willing to pay the extra buck for more fine-tuned search optimization.


Tell me what you think.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Microsoft’s Bing uses Google search results—and denies it

2/01/2011 02:56:00 PM
By now, you may have read Danny Sullivan’s recent post: “Google: Bing is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results” and heard Microsoft’s response, “We do not copy Google's results.” However you define copying, the bottom line is, these Bing results came directly from Google.

I’d like to give you some background and details of our experiments that lead us to understand just how Bing is using Google web search results.

It all started with tarsorrhaphy. Really. As it happens, tarsorrhaphy is a rare surgical procedure on eyelids. And in the summer of 2010, we were looking at the search results for an unusual misspelled query [torsorophy]. Google returned the correct spelling—tarsorrhaphy—along with results for the corrected query. At that time, Bing had no results for the misspelling. Later in the summer, Bing started returning our first result to their users without offering the spell correction (see screenshots below). This was very strange. How could they return our first result to their users without the correct spelling? Had they known the correct spelling, they could have returned several more relevant results for the corrected query.



This example opened our eyes, and over the next few months we noticed that URLs from Google search results would later appear in Bing with increasing frequency for all kinds of queries: popular queries, rare or unusual queries and misspelled queries. Even search results that we would consider mistakes of our algorithms started showing up on Bing.

We couldn’t shake the feeling that something was going on, and our suspicions became much stronger in late October 2010 when we noticed a significant increase in how often Google’s top search result appeared at the top of Bing’s ranking for a variety of queries. This statistical pattern was too striking to ignore. To test our hypothesis, we needed an experiment to determine whether Microsoft was really using Google’s search results in Bing’s ranking.

We created about 100 “synthetic queries”—queries that you would never expect a user to type, such as [hiybbprqag]. As a one-time experiment, for each synthetic query we inserted as Google’s top result a unique (real) webpage which had nothing to do with the query. Below is an example:


To be clear, the synthetic query had no relationship with the inserted result we chose—the query didn’t appear on the webpage, and there were no links to the webpage with that query phrase. In other words, there was absolutely no reason for any search engine to return that webpage for that synthetic query. You can think of the synthetic queries with inserted results as the search engine equivalent of marked bills in a bank.

We gave 20 of our engineers laptops with a fresh install of Microsoft Windows running Internet Explorer 8 with Bing Toolbar installed. As part of the install process, we opted in to the “Suggested Sites” feature of IE8, and we accepted the default options for the Bing Toolbar.

We asked these engineers to enter the synthetic queries into the search box on the Google home page, and click on the results, i.e., the results we inserted. We were surprised that within a couple weeks of starting this experiment, our inserted results started appearing in Bing. Below is an example: a search for [hiybbprqag] on Bing returned a page about seating at a theater in Los Angeles. As far as we know, the only connection between the query and result is Google’s result page (shown above).


We saw this happen for multiple queries. For the query [delhipublicschool40 chdjob] we inserted a search result for a credit union:


The same credit union soon showed up on Bing for that query:


For the query [juegosdeben1ogrande] we inserted a page of hip hop bling jewelry:


And the same hip hop bling page showed up in Bing:


As we see it, this experiment confirms our suspicion that Bing is using some combination of:
or possibly some other means to send data to Bing on what people search for on Google and the Google search results they click. Those results from Google are then more likely to show up on Bing. Put another way, some Bing results increasingly look like an incomplete, stale version of Google results—a cheap imitation.

At Google we strongly believe in innovation and are proud of our search quality. We’ve invested thousands of person-years into developing our search algorithms because we want our users to get the right answer every time they search, and that’s not easy. We look forward to competing with genuinely new search algorithms out there—algorithms built on core innovation, and not on recycled search results from a competitor. So to all the users out there looking for the most authentic, relevant search results, we encourage you to come directly to Google. And to those who have asked what we want out of all this, the answer is simple: we'd like for this practice to stop.

From Campaign Singapore: Petronas' Chinese New Year ad by LB Malaysia

One of the most important things I've learned working in the Leo Burnett network is that creativity has the power to change behavior. Finding a brand's HumanKind purpose leads to great acts, including advertising stories that move people.

I see this again in this new Petronas ad for Chinese New Year from Leo Burnett Malaysia. Great work, guys!

Gong Xi Fa Cai!

See the ad below and the feature article about it from Campaigns Singapore.

-----------------------------------------------

Leo Burnett Malaysia launches Petronas Chinese New Year ad

KUALA LUMPUR - Leo Burnett has launched Petronas’ annual Chinese New Year campaign with a commercial highlighting the importance of family bonds and filial piety.Leo Burnett Malaysia launches Petronas Chinese New Year ad

Leo Burnett launches the Petronas Chinese New Year ad today.

Petronas' Chinese New Year campaign rolls out today across Malaysian TV channels. A touching twist to Chinese New Year ads, 'Their hope' explores the silent wishes of a group of elderly citizens in a changing society where parents are often taken for granted as their children relentlessly pursue success and independence.

The 90-second TV commercial will be supported by print and digital, and this campaign also marks the first time a Facebook application has been developed for the annual CNY festive campaign. Created by Leo Burnett Malaysia, the campaign brings a collection of insights and thoughts from parents who express their hopes and wishes for this Lunar New Year.

By highlighting their wishes, the Petronas festive commercial drives home how easy it is to bring joy and a smile to the elderly – by spending more time with them and giving them the love, respect, attention and understanding that they deserve.

Since its debut in 1996, festive advertisements by Petronas have been capturing the hearts and minds of Malaysians through storytelling - sharing simple but heart-warming stories that are reflective of moral values, cultural diversity, harmony and tradition that play an important role in Malaysians’ daily lives.

Credits:

Project 'Their hope'

Client Petroliam National Berhad (PETRONAS)

Creative agency Leo Burnett Kuala Lumpur

Creative director Tan Yew Leong

Writer Ken Wong/Jovian Lee

Art director Ken Wong Woon Kian

Production company Chilly Pepper

Director Tan Yew Leong

Editor Affendi of Mirage

Post production APV

Exposure TV, press and online (Facebook and FB applications)

NuffNang Breaks

Spread the word!